Mon premier blog

Either/Or : Part 1 Kierkegaard's Writings Edna H. Hong, Howard V. Hong, Soren Kierkegaard
Publisher: Princeton University Press

EITHER/ORPART IKIERKEGAARDS WRITINGS, III EITHER/ORPART Iby S0ren KierkegaardEdited and Translated with Introduction and Notes byHoward V. I have a moderately sized collection of books. My father-in-law, though, has quite an impressive collection of books. He adapted the Sermon on the Mount for American audiences, writing, “Blessed are the happy who have everything, because they won't need to be comforted” and “Blessed are the impeccably dressed, because they will look nice when they see God.” He responded sharply to Kierkegaard's Either/Or with a treatise titled Both/And, followed by the conciliatory Either/Or and/or Both/And. Download Either/Or : Part 1 Kierkegaard's Writings - Free chm, pdf ebooks rapidshare download, ebook torrents bittorrent download. A good friend, who went to the trouble of writing a doctoral dissertation on Kierkegaard, once remarked to me that he thought that, rather than calling him a philosopher, we ought to call him an evangelical psychologist. Gurgioli's longtime obsession with Kierkegaard's “A Seducer's Diary,” from the book Either/Or by the nineteenth century Danish philosopher. It seems like rather an imposing Recommended. You are exactly right, Michael. €�Either/Or” by Soren Kierkegaard, abridged and translated by Alastair Hannay. Gurgioli composed the music specifically for The Dialtones, collectively under the title Calculated Carelessness, based upon the various characteristics of Kierkegaard's writing, utilizing deconstructed lines from the story as lyrics. I was rather sloppy in what I wrote above, and I wrongly described Either/Or (Part II) and Fear and Trembling as aesthetic works. Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. The very best works of philosophy, things like Kierkegaard's Either/Or or Nietzsche's Twilight of the Idols, don't occupy a separate category in my brain as “Great Books comma philosophy”; they stand on their own merits as truly great works. What's your feeling on that, given that your writing at the time seemed to blend a lot of these elements, well before we had any discourse on the ostensible uniqueness of such hybridization?